Arguments in favor of Omeka?

Hi,
I’m new to Omeka, but I’m part of a scholarly organization seeking to move a long-time print series into the digital world. Omeka seems to provide an interface that can be fairly accessible to our members. As I report back and move through various sets of test groups of users, I’m getting reasonable follow-up questions about certain aspects of the platform, and would like any advice that you might have for me as we think about adoping Omeka.

  1. the issue of longevity of the program. I will always note that there are no guarantees, but the breadth of the Omeka userbase its status as open source seem to argue for there being some long-term functionality (and support). I would also argue that since it really runs on top of a mySQL DB, that our DB could be ported to a new system, if ever needed. Are there other arguments or views about this issue that I might want to include?

  2. We are an international group and the ability for users to have access to the Omeka platform in their languages will be important. I am aware that there is some localisation available. Can anyone speak to how successful that has been in their own projects?

  3. I have set up a trial version of Omeka, using Omeka Classic, but are there sufficient benefits to consider moving to Omeka S. ? Our database is text only and our records have very limited fields.

Thanks in advance for any insights, thoughts or suggestions you might have,
NB